Mobile Menu
Alerts

Stichting Shell Pensioenfonds v Krys

December 2014 Mark J. Forte

A recent decision of the Privy Council in Stichting Shell Pensioenfonds v Krys and another (British Virgin Islands) [2014] UKPC 41 clarifies a liquidator’s authority in relation to anti-suit injunctions and provides guidance as to what amounts to a submission to the jurisdiction within the liquidation process.

The case arose out of the liquidation of Fairfield Sentry (“Fairfield”), a BVI feeder fund of the collapsed Madoff fund. Fairfield Sentry had assets in its own name at a Dutch bank account in an account in Ireland (“the bank account”).

 

To continue reading full articles in PDF format:
Stichting Shell Pensioenfonds v Krys

 


Mark J. Forte
Partner, Head of BVI Litigation & Restructuring and Office

British Virgin Islands   +1 284 346 1113


Accolades
_

"Few firms can come close to Conyers on one critical metric, and this is the breadth of the client base."
- IFLR1000

Related International Markets

British Virgin Islands


Media Contact

For media enquiries, please contact media@conyersdill.com

Alerts

Stichting Shell Pensioenfonds v Krys

18 December 2014 Mark J. Forte

A recent decision of the Privy Council in Stichting Shell Pensioenfonds v Krys and another (British Virgin Islands) [2014] UKPC 41 clarifies a liquidator’s authority in relation to anti-suit injunctions and provides guidance as to what amounts to a submission to the jurisdiction within the liquidation process.

The case arose out of the liquidation of Fairfield Sentry (“Fairfield”), a BVI feeder fund of the collapsed Madoff fund. Fairfield Sentry had assets in its own name at a Dutch bank account in an account in Ireland (“the bank account”).

 

To continue reading full articles in PDF format:
Stichting Shell Pensioenfonds v Krys

 


Mark J. Forte
Partner, Head of BVI Litigation & Restructuring and Office

British Virgin Islands   +1 284 346 1113


 

International Office(s)

British Virgin Islands