Mobile Menu
Offshore Cases

In the Matter of Z-obee Holdings Limited [2017] SC (Bda) 16 Com (21 February 2017)

February 2017 Companies Insolvency Restructuring Winding Up Liquidation

BERMUDA

SUPREME COURT

WINDING-UP - COMPANY PETITION - APPOINTMENT JOINT PROVISIONAL LIQUIDATORS TO MONITOR IMPLEMENTATION OF INSOLVENT RESTRUCTURING BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHETHER JURISDICTION EXISTS TO UTILIZE PROVISIONAL LIQUIDATION PROCEEDINGS IN AID OF A RESTRUCTURING WHICH IS DESIGNED TO RESULT IN THE PETITION BEING ULTIMATELY DISMISSED-COMPANIES ACT, 1981, SECTIONS 164 AND 170

Z-obee Holdings concerned a company that had been in provisional liquidation in Hong Kong since June 2014. The Hong Kong provisional liquidators had identified a potential investor and sought to restructure rather than wind-up. The company subsequently presented a petition in Bermuda and applied to appoint the same provisional liquidators in the Bermuda proceedings with their powers restricted to the explicit purpose of affecting the restructuring. In providing reasons for allowing the appointment, the Court reiterated that it has, for 20 years, construed the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1981 so as to enable it to appoint provisional liquidators with limited powers in order to allow the company to implement a restructuring. The fact that it was proposed that the winding-up proceedings be adjourned (and may ultimately be dismissed) did not impact this position. Reiterating the sentiment of both Energy XXI (In the Matter of Energy XXI Ltd [2016] SC (Bda) 79 Com) and C&J In the Matter of C & J Energy Services Ltd [2017] SC (Bda) 20 Com, the Judge held that the Court has a broad discretion to adjourn a petition for good reason and that power was clearly flexible enough to encompass an adjournment to enable alternatives to a winding-up to be explored. Should the alternatives no longer be realistic, the Court may, on the application of creditors, determine that it’s no longer appropriate to continue to adjourn the winding-up petition. This is unlikely where the majority of creditors are in favour of the adjournment.

 

To continue reading full articles in PDF format:
In the Matter of Z-obee Holdings Limited [2017] SC (Bda) 16 Com (21 February 2017)

 

Accolades
_

"Few firms can come close to Conyers on one critical metric, and this is the breadth of the client base."
- IFLR1000

EDITOR & HEAD OF LITIGATION BERMUDA

Christian R. Luthi
Tel: +1 441 298 7814
Email: christian.luthi@conyersdill.com


Head of Litigation British virgin islands

Mark J. Forte
Tel: +1 284 852 1113
Email: mark.forte@conyersdill.com


Head of Litigation Cayman Islands

Paul Smith
Tel: +1 345 814 7777
Email: paul.smith@conyersdill.com


HEAD OF THE ASIA DISPUTES & RESTRUCTURING GROUP

Nigel K. Meeson, QC
Tel: +852 2842 9553
Email: nigel.meeson@conyersdill.com

Offshore Cases

In the Matter of Z-obee Holdings Limited [2017] SC (Bda) 16 Com (21 February 2017)

21 February 2017

BERMUDA

SUPREME COURT

WINDING-UP - COMPANY PETITION - APPOINTMENT JOINT PROVISIONAL LIQUIDATORS TO MONITOR IMPLEMENTATION OF INSOLVENT RESTRUCTURING BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHETHER JURISDICTION EXISTS TO UTILIZE PROVISIONAL LIQUIDATION PROCEEDINGS IN AID OF A RESTRUCTURING WHICH IS DESIGNED TO RESULT IN THE PETITION BEING ULTIMATELY DISMISSED-COMPANIES ACT, 1981, SECTIONS 164 AND 170

Z-obee Holdings concerned a company that had been in provisional liquidation in Hong Kong since June 2014. The Hong Kong provisional liquidators had identified a potential investor and sought to restructure rather than wind-up. The company subsequently presented a petition in Bermuda and applied to appoint the same provisional liquidators in the Bermuda proceedings with their powers restricted to the explicit purpose of affecting the restructuring. In providing reasons for allowing the appointment, the Court reiterated that it has, for 20 years, construed the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1981 so as to enable it to appoint provisional liquidators with limited powers in order to allow the company to implement a restructuring. The fact that it was proposed that the winding-up proceedings be adjourned (and may ultimately be dismissed) did not impact this position. Reiterating the sentiment of both Energy XXI (In the Matter of Energy XXI Ltd [2016] SC (Bda) 79 Com) and C&J In the Matter of C & J Energy Services Ltd [2017] SC (Bda) 20 Com, the Judge held that the Court has a broad discretion to adjourn a petition for good reason and that power was clearly flexible enough to encompass an adjournment to enable alternatives to a winding-up to be explored. Should the alternatives no longer be realistic, the Court may, on the application of creditors, determine that it’s no longer appropriate to continue to adjourn the winding-up petition. This is unlikely where the majority of creditors are in favour of the adjournment.

 

To continue reading full articles in PDF format:
In the Matter of Z-obee Holdings Limited [2017] SC (Bda) 16 Com (21 February 2017)

 

 

EDITOR & HEAD OF LITIGATION BERMUDA

Christian R. Luthi
Tel.: +1 441 298 7814
Email.: christian.luthi@conyersdill.com


Head of Litigation British virgin islands

Mark J. Forte
Tel.: +1 284 852 1113
Email.: mark.forte@conyersdill.com


Head of Litigation Cayman Islands

Paul Smith
Tel.: +1 345 814 7777
Email.: paul.smith@conyersdill.com


HEAD OF THE ASIA DISPUTES & RESTRUCTURING GROUP

Nigel K. Meeson, Q.C.
Tel.: +852 2842 9553
Email.: nigel.meeson@conyersdill.com