Mobile Menu
Offshore Cases

Capital Partners Securities -v- Sturgeon Central Asia Balanced Fund [2016] SC (Bda) 68 Com

June 2016 Companies Rectification of Share Register

BERMUDA

SUPREME COURT

APPLICATION FOR RECTIFICATION OF REGISTER - COMPANIES ACT, 1981 SECTION 67 - NOMINEE SHAREHOLDER - REFUSAL BY COMPANY TO REGISTER CHANGE OF LEGAL OWNERSHIP - RELEVANCE OF NEED TO INVESTIGATE IDENTITY OF BENEFICIAL OWNERS AS GROUNDS OF REFUSAL - CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO GIVE NOTICE OF REFUSAL TO REGISTER TRANSFER WITHIN STATUTORY TIME PERIOD - COMPANIES ACT, 1981 SECTION 50

The Plaintiff sought the substantive relief of a declaration that a transfer of shares in the Defendant Fund to the Plaintiff from its nominee was a valid transfer of the Participating Shares, and an Order that the Fund’s Directors should rectify the share registers and give all necessary approvals to reflect that valid transfer. The background of litigation to this case was that the Plaintiff had previously sought to petition for the winding up of the Company as a contributory, and this transfer of shares from its nominee was intended to facilitate that process. The Defendant claimed that it needed time to consider whether the transfer could be registered, pending further investigation into the beneficial ownership of the relevant shares under recent stringent anti-money-laundering legislation. However, in the process, it exceeded the proscribed time for giving notice of refusal to register a transfer pursuant to Section 50 of the Companies Act, 1981. The central question was therefore whether the Defendant’s regulatory concerns were sufficient grounds to refuse to register the transfer, in light of the fact that no beneficial ownership had apparently changed in the transfer of shares and of the Plaintiff’s ultimate goal in pursuing the transfer.

 

To continue reading full articles in PDF format:
Capital Partners Securities -v- Sturgeon Central Asia Balanced Fund [2016] SC (Bda) 68 Com

 

Accolades
_

"Few firms can come close to Conyers on one critical metric, and this is the breadth of the client base."
- IFLR1000

EDITOR & HEAD OF LITIGATION BERMUDA

Christian R. Luthi
Tel: +1 441 298 7814
Email: christian.luthi@conyersdill.com


Head of Litigation British virgin islands

Mark J. Forte
Tel: +1 284 852 1113
Email: mark.forte@conyersdill.com


Head of Litigation Cayman Islands

Paul Smith
Tel: +1 345 814 7777
Email: paul.smith@conyersdill.com


HEAD OF THE ASIA DISPUTES & RESTRUCTURING GROUP

Nigel K. Meeson, QC
Tel: +852 2842 9553
Email: nigel.meeson@conyersdill.com

Offshore Cases

Capital Partners Securities -v- Sturgeon Central Asia Balanced Fund [2016] SC (Bda) 68 Com

01 June 2016

BERMUDA

SUPREME COURT

APPLICATION FOR RECTIFICATION OF REGISTER - COMPANIES ACT, 1981 SECTION 67 - NOMINEE SHAREHOLDER - REFUSAL BY COMPANY TO REGISTER CHANGE OF LEGAL OWNERSHIP - RELEVANCE OF NEED TO INVESTIGATE IDENTITY OF BENEFICIAL OWNERS AS GROUNDS OF REFUSAL - CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO GIVE NOTICE OF REFUSAL TO REGISTER TRANSFER WITHIN STATUTORY TIME PERIOD - COMPANIES ACT, 1981 SECTION 50

The Plaintiff sought the substantive relief of a declaration that a transfer of shares in the Defendant Fund to the Plaintiff from its nominee was a valid transfer of the Participating Shares, and an Order that the Fund’s Directors should rectify the share registers and give all necessary approvals to reflect that valid transfer. The background of litigation to this case was that the Plaintiff had previously sought to petition for the winding up of the Company as a contributory, and this transfer of shares from its nominee was intended to facilitate that process. The Defendant claimed that it needed time to consider whether the transfer could be registered, pending further investigation into the beneficial ownership of the relevant shares under recent stringent anti-money-laundering legislation. However, in the process, it exceeded the proscribed time for giving notice of refusal to register a transfer pursuant to Section 50 of the Companies Act, 1981. The central question was therefore whether the Defendant’s regulatory concerns were sufficient grounds to refuse to register the transfer, in light of the fact that no beneficial ownership had apparently changed in the transfer of shares and of the Plaintiff’s ultimate goal in pursuing the transfer.

 

To continue reading full articles in PDF format:
Capital Partners Securities -v- Sturgeon Central Asia Balanced Fund [2016] SC (Bda) 68 Com

 

 

EDITOR & HEAD OF LITIGATION BERMUDA

Christian R. Luthi
Tel.: +1 441 298 7814
Email.: christian.luthi@conyersdill.com


Head of Litigation British virgin islands

Mark J. Forte
Tel.: +1 284 852 1113
Email.: mark.forte@conyersdill.com


Head of Litigation Cayman Islands

Paul Smith
Tel.: +1 345 814 7777
Email.: paul.smith@conyersdill.com


HEAD OF THE ASIA DISPUTES & RESTRUCTURING GROUP

Nigel K. Meeson, Q.C.
Tel.: +852 2842 9553
Email.: nigel.meeson@conyersdill.com