Mobile Menu
Offshore Cases

Annuity & Life -v- Kingboard [2015] (Bda) LR 97

November 2015 Companies

BERMUDA

SUPREME COURT

COMPANY LAW - SHAREHOLDERS - TEST FOR UNFAIR PREJUDICE - APPLICATION TO PUBLIC COMPANIES

Shareholders who believe that they are being treated unfairly have several remedies. One of the most effective can be an unfair prejudice petition. Such petitions were historically rare in Bermuda, not least because the hurdle is a high one. A petitioner must not only show that its interests (as shareholder) have been unfairly prejudiced. It must also show that the prejudice is so bad that it would justify the winding up of the company on just and equitable grounds.

In Annuity & Life -v- Kingboard [2015] (Bda) LR 97, Kawaley CJ found that this test had been met. What makes the case particularly notable is that Kingboard is a company publically listed on the Singapore Stock Exchange.

 

To continue reading full articles in PDF format:
Annuity & Life -v- Kingboard [2015] (Bda) LR 97

 

Accolades
_

"Few firms can come close to Conyers on one critical metric, and this is the breadth of the client base."
- IFLR1000

EDITOR & HEAD OF LITIGATION BERMUDA

Christian R. Luthi
Tel: +1 441 298 7814
Email: christian.luthi@conyersdill.com


Head of Litigation British virgin islands

Mark J. Forte
Tel: +1 284 852 1113
Email: mark.forte@conyersdill.com


Head of Litigation Cayman Islands

Paul Smith
Tel: +1 345 814 7777
Email: paul.smith@conyersdill.com


HEAD OF THE ASIA DISPUTES & RESTRUCTURING GROUP

Nigel K. Meeson, QC
Tel: +852 2842 9553
Email: nigel.meeson@conyersdill.com

Offshore Cases

Annuity & Life -v- Kingboard [2015] (Bda) LR 97

20 November 2015

BERMUDA

SUPREME COURT

COMPANY LAW - SHAREHOLDERS - TEST FOR UNFAIR PREJUDICE - APPLICATION TO PUBLIC COMPANIES

Shareholders who believe that they are being treated unfairly have several remedies. One of the most effective can be an unfair prejudice petition. Such petitions were historically rare in Bermuda, not least because the hurdle is a high one. A petitioner must not only show that its interests (as shareholder) have been unfairly prejudiced. It must also show that the prejudice is so bad that it would justify the winding up of the company on just and equitable grounds.

In Annuity & Life -v- Kingboard [2015] (Bda) LR 97, Kawaley CJ found that this test had been met. What makes the case particularly notable is that Kingboard is a company publically listed on the Singapore Stock Exchange.

 

To continue reading full articles in PDF format:
Annuity & Life -v- Kingboard [2015] (Bda) LR 97

 

 

EDITOR & HEAD OF LITIGATION BERMUDA

Christian R. Luthi
Tel.: +1 441 298 7814
Email.: christian.luthi@conyersdill.com


Head of Litigation British virgin islands

Mark J. Forte
Tel.: +1 284 852 1113
Email.: mark.forte@conyersdill.com


Head of Litigation Cayman Islands

Paul Smith
Tel.: +1 345 814 7777
Email.: paul.smith@conyersdill.com


HEAD OF THE ASIA DISPUTES & RESTRUCTURING GROUP

Nigel K. Meeson, Q.C.
Tel.: +852 2842 9553
Email.: nigel.meeson@conyersdill.com