In this case the Appellant, Anison Rabess and Joyce Rabess sought to appeal the Master’s refusal to set aside Judgment in Default. The Judgment in Default was never served on the Appellants and in any event was for the wrong amount. In allowing the appeal Mitchell JA (AG) held that if a default Judgment is to be capable of being enforced it must be personally served on the defendants: Civil Procedure Rules (“CPR”) 42.6 applies.
Further that if it is alleged by a defendant that a default judgment has been entered against him for an excessive amount and that the judgment ought to be set aside, CPR 13.3 and 13.4 do not apply to limit the discretion of the Master. The Learned Justice of Appeal found that CPR 13.3 merely limited a defendant’s right to set aside a default judgment when it is intended to file a defence.
To continue reading full articles in PDF format:
Anison Rabess and Joyce Rabess -v- National Bank of Dominica HCVAP 2011/30